|
To ensure that tourism
strategy recommendations reflect market realities and opportunities, it
is important that they reflect consideration of available visitor
demographic information. Essentially, Revelstoke has two distinct
tourism “seasons”. In the winter season, Revelstoke is a tourism
destination, and the majority of tourism activities is based on snow
sports, particularly heli-and cat-skiing and boarding, and snowmobiling.
In the summer, Revelstoke benefits from its location on the Trans Canada
Highway (TCH) for tourist traffic. Many tourists come to visit the local
national parks or the community as part of a longer trip.
A) Winter Visitation
While it is difficult to
obtain precise heli- and cat-skiing and boarding visitation information
for Revelstoke, a recent (2001) survey undertaken for the B.C Helicopter
and Snowcat Skiing Operators Association estimated that a total of 8,719
tourists visited the Revelstoke/Selkirks region during the 2000-01
season. Of these visitors, 4,879 (56%) were from the U.S., 2,398 (27.5%)
were international tourists, 1,442 (16.5%) were from Canada, excluding
B.C., and 586 (6.7%) were from B.C. The local market is constrained by
the number of operators and by the number of accommodation properties in
the backcountry. Currently, most local operators are functioning at full
capacity. Local operators undertake their own marketing efforts very
successfully, and have established a very high reputation for delivery
of a quality tourism product.
In terms of snowmobiling,
the Revelstoke Snowmobile Strategy completed in 2003, indicated that the
number of visitors who come to Revelstoke to snowmobile increased by
600% between 1991 and 2001. The total number of visitations (overnight
stays) for the 2001-02 season was estimated at 22,000. The consensus
among local hotel/motel owners, the Snowmobile Society and the
Revelstoke Snowmobile Club is that there is the potential to increase
the number of visitors by at least 50% without affecting the quality of
the product.
A survey of snowmobilers
who visited Revelstoke between December 2001 and April 2002, indicated
that 72% were male, 21% were female, and 7% were children. Approximately
68% of respondents to the survey were from Alberta, 15% from other parts
of Canada, 10% from the north-west U.S., 5% from other parts of B.C.,
and 2% from other U.S. locations.
B) Summer Visitation
While Revelstoke has not
established itself as a summer destination as is the case for the winter
season, there is a huge tourism potential based on the city’s location
on the TCH and the close proximity to two national parks.
Volume of
Highway Traffic
One method of determining
the number of visitors to our area is to consider traffic count
information. Traffic count data has been collected by Parks Canada at
Rogers Pass and by Ministry of Transportation at Craigellachie. The
traffic counts west of Revelstoke indicates a higher volume of traffic
than counted at Rogers Pass.
A) Parks Canada Traffic Count Data
Until 1995, the number of
people who drive the TCH through Revelstoke was increasing annually.
According to traffic count data maintained by Parks Canada for Rogers
Pass, the number of people driving through Rogers Pass increased an
average of 4.5% per year for the period 1990 to 1995, reaching a total
of almost 4.08 million in 1995 (which was down somewhat from the 4.15
million persons who drove through Rogers Pass in 1994). Traffic count
data was unavailable for the period 1996 to 2000, however data from 2001
and 2002 indicate that traffic flow is once again increasing.
|
Table 2-2
Rogers Pass Annual Traffic for Years
1990, 1995, 2001 and 2002 |
|
Year
|
Rogers Pass Traffic
Number of Vehicles |
Rogers Pass Traffic
Number of Persons* |
|
1990 |
1,336,102 |
3,340,255 |
|
1995 |
1,633,973 |
4,084,933 |
|
2001 |
1,619,692 |
4,049,230 |
|
2002 |
1,708,093 |
4,270,233 |
*Figures derived by
multiplying total vehicle counts by 2.5 - the average number of
persons per vehicle as identified by informal Parks Canada surveys
conducted by Mount Revelstoke and Glacier National Parks staff.
B) Ministry of Transportation
Traffic Count Data
The number of vehicles travelling the TCH at
Craigellachie has been steadily increasing over the past three years.
Analysis of the data presented in Table 2-3 and the following
assumptions would indicate a potential for 3 million tourists travelling
through our area.
The following assumptions were made to
estimate tourism traffic. As no concrete figures are available, these
assumptions are considered a ‘best guess’:
a) 10%
of car and light truck traffic is local
b) 25% of bus, RV & delivery truck traffic would be of a tourism nature
Calculation of potential
tourism traffic:
(90% of 1,252,680) + (25%
of 232.870) = 1,185,630 vehicles using the ratio of 2.5 persons/vehicle = 2,964,075 persons
|
Table 2-3
Craigellachie Traffic Counts for the years
2000 – 2002 |
|
Vehicle Type |
2000
294 days counted |
2001
354 days counted |
2002
342 days counted |
|
|
Vol. |
Daily Avg. |
Annual Count |
Vol. |
Daily Avg. |
Annual Count |
Vol. |
Daily Avg. |
Annual Count |
|
Car & Light Truck |
874,310 |
2,973 |
1,085,145 |
1,157,139 |
3,270 |
1,193,550 |
1,174,165 |
3,432 |
1,252,680 |
|
Bus, RV & Delivery Truck
6.0 - 12.5 m |
173,104 |
589 |
214,985 |
232,297 |
656 |
239,440 |
218,104 |
638 |
232,870 |
|
Trailer Trucks 12.5 -
22.5 m |
178,354 |
606 |
221,190 |
204,141 |
577 |
210,605 |
203,689 |
595 |
217,175 |
|
B - Train& multi trailer
trucks |
148,394 |
504 |
183,960 |
190,283 |
538 |
196,370 |
405,138 |
550 |
200,750 |
|
Estimated Annual Vehicle
Count |
|
|
1,705,280 |
|
|
1,839,965 |
|
|
1,903,475 |
Visitor Characteristics
Information on the profile of existing
visitors (including pass-through visitors) can be used to identify
opportunities for increasing current market penetration levels and/or
increasing length of stay. Ideally, it would be helpful to understand:
- where visitors
live;
- who they are;
- the activities
in which they currently participate;
- what they want
to do or would be interested in doing;
- how easily
they can travel to Revelstoke; and
- when they
travel.
Sources of information were obtained
from Parks Canada and from data collected at the the Revelstoke Visitor
Information Centre.
A) Parks Canada Data
Mount Revelstoke and Glacier National
Parks completed a Visitor Exit Survey in 1998. The following information
has been tabulated from the survey results from 4,566 vehicles
interviewed during the spring, summer and fall of 1998.
- 78% were
passenger vehicles with 21% equipped for camping
- Persons per
vehicle averaged at 2.7
- 27% of
visitors were staying 1 night within 80 km of the parks
- 19% of
visitors were staying 2 - 3 nights within 80 km of the parks
- 11% of
visitors were staying 4 - 6 nights within 80 km of the parks
- 11% of
visitors were staying 7 - 13 nights within 80 km of the parks
- 28% of
visitors were not staying overnight in the area
Parks Canada collects visitor
information on an annual basis at the Rogers Pass Centre in Glacier
National Park. The following data is pertinent:
- Attendance at
Rogers Pass Centre declined steadily since record visitation in 1994
of 206,322 persons. However in 2002 attendance at the Centre
increased significantly. Current visitation statistics:
- 1999 - 125,327 persons
- 2000 - 123,381 persons
- 2001 - 109,171 persons
- 2002 - 139,190 persons
- Approximately
three-quarters (74%) of park visitors are from Canada (including 25%
from B.C.), while one-quarter (26%) are from outside of Canada.
- Park visitors
are more likely to be male (60%) than female (40%).
- The age
categories of park visitors are fairly evenly distributed as
approximately one-quarter (24%) are children under the age of 17,
just over one-quarter (27%) are older youth or young adults, just
over one-quarter (27%) are middle-aged adults, and just under
one-quarter (22%) are older adults.
- Just under
eight in ten visitors (79%) are travelling with family members.
- A somewhat
higher proportion of pass through visitors than park visitors (59%
vs. 54%) travel by car, while a somewhat higher proportion of park
visitors than pass through visitors travel in some form of
camperized vehicle (31% vs. 24%).
- Most park
visitors (87%) are more likely to be travelling for pleasure than
pass through visitors (77%).
- Park visitors
are more inclined to camp (trailer or tent) while pass through
visitors are more inclined to stay in hotels/motels or other private
accommodation.
|
Table 2-4
Parks Canada Visitor Profile Data for Visitors to
Mt. Revelstoke and Glacier National Parks and Pass-Through Visitors
(1998) |
|
Characteristics |
Park Visitors |
Pass Through Traffic |
|
Origin |
B.C.
Alberta
Other Canada
USA
Germany
Other Europe
Other |
24%
22%
28%
10%
6%
8%
2% |
n/a |
|
Average Party Size |
|
2.5 |
n/a |
|
Gender(3) |
Males
Females |
60%
40% |
n/a |
|
Age |
Less than 6
6 - 16
17 - 24
25 - 34
35 - 49
50 - 64
64+ |
7%
17%
10%
17%
27%
14%
8% |
n/a |
|
Party Composition |
Family
Friends
Family and
Friends
Other |
79%
15%
5%
1% |
n/a |
|
Type of Passenger Vehicle |
Car
Truck
Van
Vehicle with
trailer
Camper
RV
Motorcycle
Other |
54%
12%
13%
7%
4%
7%
1%
2% |
59%
13%
12%
6%
4%
3%
2%
1% |
Trip Purpose
(all 6 parks) |
Pleasure
Business
Business and
Pleasure
Other |
86%
8%
4%
2% |
86%
8%
4%
2% |
Planned specifically
to visit parks: |
Yes
No |
48%
52% |
20%
80% |
|
Accommodation: (4) |
Tent
Trailer (all kinds)
Hotel/Motel
Private
Hostel
Other |
20%
31%
42%
21%
1%
5% |
9%
23%
36%
41%
1%
7% |
|
Park License Purchased |
Did not purchase
Daily
Four Day
Annual
Senior Citizen
Local / Resident |
56%
11%
13%
12%
6%
2% |
n/a |
(3) Data on gender, age
and party composition is for the Six Mountain Parks. No breakdown of
this data is available for Mount Revelstoke and Glacier National
Parks.
(4) Visitors use more than one type of accommodation so the total
exceeds 100%.
B) Revelstoke Visitor Info Centre
- Visitor Profile Information
The Revelstoke Visitor
Info Centre tracks basic market information on each visitor party
requesting information from the Centre. Staff attempt to collect
information on the origin, length of stay, and information requested, of
visitors who stop at the Info Centre. Table 2-5 summarizes the
information collected for the summers of 2000 to 2003 at both the
satellite (highway) and main (downtown) offices. Because of the
difficulty of acquiring information from all visitors, the following
analysis focuses on the proportion rather than the number of visitors to
which each profile category applies. Based on this approach, the
following observations can be made:
-
European visitation has dropped somewhat but still accounts for more
than 25% of the visitors. North American visitors have increased
slightly while Asian visitation has decreased by 50%.
-
Most visitors are either visiting for the day or planning to stay
one night and about 10% of visitors stay for 2 or 3 days.
|
Table 2-5
Revelstoke Visitor InfoCentre Visitor’s Market
Profile (May to Sept. 2000/01/02/03) |
|
|
Summer 2000 |
Summer 2001 |
Summer 2002 |
Summer 2003 |
|
Number of Parties |
20,727 |
|
18,256 |
|
18,380 |
|
18,507 |
|
|
Number of Visitors |
40,587 |
|
34,186 |
|
34,947 |
|
43,828 |
|
|
Visitor
Origin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local |
327 |
2% |
409 |
3% |
705 |
5% |
547 |
3% |
|
BC |
2504 |
19% |
2106 |
17% |
2788 |
20% |
1956 |
11% |
|
Neighbour Prov/Terr |
2282 |
17% |
2132 |
17% |
2524 |
18% |
2124 |
11% |
|
Neighbour States |
244 |
2% |
512 |
4% |
375 |
3% |
607 |
3% |
|
Other Canada |
1265 |
9% |
1607 |
13% |
1648 |
12% |
2632 |
14% |
|
Other USA & Mexico |
901 |
7% |
1482 |
12% |
1310 |
9% |
233 |
13% |
|
Asia |
1009 |
8% |
620 |
5% |
521 |
4% |
1014 |
5% |
|
Europe |
4556 |
34% |
3399 |
27% |
3618 |
26% |
5757 |
31% |
|
Other |
226 |
2% |
277 |
2% |
467 |
3% |
1512 |
8% |
|
Nights in Revelstoke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Day |
6287 |
58% |
2714 |
44% |
6906 |
57% |
6286 |
43% |
|
1 Day |
3495 |
33% |
2527 |
41% |
4260 |
35% |
6405 |
44% |
|
2 to 3 Days |
978 |
9% |
857 |
14% |
859 |
7% |
1772 |
12% |
|
4 to 7 Days |
30 |
0% |
55 |
1% |
48 |
0% |
80 |
1% |
|
8 to 14 Days |
4 |
0% |
7 |
0% |
13 |
0% |
14 |
0% |
|
15+ |
8 |
0% |
3 |
0% |
10 |
0% |
26 |
0% |
|
|
10802 |
100% |
6163 |
100% |
12096 |
100% |
14583 |
100% |
Summary Observations from
Revelstoke Area Visitors
The Parks Canada and Visitor InfoCentre
visitor profile data indicate that the number of visitors travelling in
the Revelstoke area during the summer months has decreased somewhat from
the mid nineties but has remained fairly consistent over the last two to
three years; that these visitors are most likely to be sightseeing
(passing through or spending one night) or participating in outdoor
adventure activities; that a relatively high proportion are from Europe
and other areas of Canada; that the majority (approximately 75%) are
adults.
Although Revelstoke has
yet to take full advantage of these trends, they provide some indication
of the tremendous potential of the region’s tourism industry. Each year,
Revelstoke has the opportunity to try and entice more than three million
drive-by travellers to enjoy the community’s tourism facilities and
services. A high proportion of area visitors are adults from long haul
markets who tend to spend more on a daily basis than is typical for
travellers from short haul markets. These travellers are looking for
places to visit and opportunities to spend money. While many other
communities are competing for their attention, few offer the mix of
products, amenities and ambiance available in Revelstoke.
Regional, Provincial and
National Visitor Profiles
It is also important to take into
consideration market realities and interests for visitors to British
Columbia as well as visitors to Canada. A regional (West BC Rockies)
Visitor Report compiled by Tourism BC presents the characteristics of
visitors who were on an overnight trip to BC and visited the west BC
Rockies while on their trip during 1995/96.
| Regional Canada |
59% |
|
BC Residents: |
|
| Regional U.S.
|
17% |
|
Southern BC
|
55% |
| Europe |
8% |
|
Greater Vancouver Region
|
34% |
| Long Haul U.S.
|
7% |
|
Vancouver Island
|
9% |
| Long Haul Canada
|
6% |
|
Northern BC
|
2% |
| Asia/Pacific 3% |
|
|
|
|
| Other Overseas
|
1% |
|
|
|
Shown in the following
table are responses from two different surveys taken, one for regional
visitors and one for provincial visitors. The method of data collection
for regional visitors was in the form of an ‘unaided’ diary in which
they used their own words, while the provincial visitors completed a
questionnaire with a specific listing of activities to chose from. They
are not directly comparable.
|
Table 2-6
Regional and Provincial Visitor Activities
(1995/96) |
|
Activity |
Non
Resident
Visitors to Region % |
Visitors to the Province |
|
Non
Resident
% |
Regional Canada
% |
BC
Resident % |
|
|
|
City/Town
Activities: |
|
Dining out in
restaurants |
|
78 |
80 |
73 |
|
Shopping |
|
76 |
79 |
51 |
|
Sightseeing in
city/town |
25 |
75 |
74 |
-- |
|
Nightlife/
entertainment |
|
36 |
75 |
24 |
|
Land Based
Activities |
|
Visiting nat’l/prov
park |
|
63 |
63 |
36 |
|
Whale viewing/
bird watching |
|
52 |
51 |
43 |
|
Camping |
|
41 |
51 |
-- |
|
Hiking/
backpacking |
14 |
40 |
41 |
41 |
|
Bicycling |
|
26 |
35 |
17 |
|
Exploring
backcountry /
wilderness |
4 |
30 |
35 |
-- |
|
Downhill skiing
/
snowboarding |
7 |
|
|
|
|
Winter Activities |
|
17 |
22 |
6 |
|
Ocean Based
Activities |
Whale watching/
boating |
|
22 |
36 |
-- |
|
Fishing |
|
6 |
11 |
-- |
|
Fresh Water
Activities |
Boating
(sail/power) |
|
26 |
36 |
-- |
|
Fishing |
|
9 |
11 |
-- |
|
Photography |
|
58 |
57 |
48 |
|
Swimming |
15 |
43 |
53 |
-- |
|
Golfing |
12 |
26 |
33 |
-- |
|
Events |
|
Sporting |
4 |
26 |
33 |
-- |
Local festivals/fairs/
events |
|
20 |
17 |
12 |
|
Attractions |
Zoos/natural
displays/gardens |
6 |
51 |
56 |
14 |
|
Historic Sites |
|
47 |
49 |
26 |
Amusement or
theme park |
|
31 |
40 |
-- |
Wineries/farm
tours |
|
30 |
34 |
3 |
Native (Indian)
cultural sites |
|
28 |
29 |
3 |
Art galleries/
Museums |
5 |
26 |
23 |
17 |
|
Visiting Friends |
11 |
|
|
|
|
Resting/Relaxing |
7 |
|
|
|
Please note in Table 2.7
that non-resident expenditures represent all moneys spent while in
BC, while resident expenditures represent only moneys spent in the
region. They are not directly comparable.
|
Table 2-7
Visitor spending while in BC
And BC Resident spending while in the Region |
|
%
Distribution of Total |
Spending While in Province |
Spending in
Region |
|
Regional |
Long Haul |
Overseas |
BC
Resident |
|
Cdn |
US |
Cdn |
US |
Cdn |
US |
|
Food & Beverage |
27 |
24 |
31 |
15 |
16 |
18 |
39 |
|
Accommodation |
26 |
20 |
20 |
14 |
11 |
15 |
20 |
|
Transportation |
14 |
16 |
20 |
13 |
13 |
6 |
15 |
|
Souvenirs and gifts |
7 |
4 |
9 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
3 |
|
Package tours purchased in BC |
6 |
17 |
7 |
35 |
31 |
30 |
n/a |
|
Outdoor activities |
5 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
9 |
|
Attractions & Cultural Events |
3 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
<1 |
6 |
|
Other expenses |
13 |
15 |
8 |
8 |
16 |
21 |
7 |
|
Table 2-8
Value of Tourism
Province of BC for the Year 2001 |
|
Market |
Visitor Volume
Total 22.5 million |
Visitor Revenue
Total $9.5 billion |
|
British Columbia |
48.1% |
26.6% |
|
Canada |
21.6% |
29.8% |
|
United States |
22.7% |
25.5% |
|
Asia/Pacific |
3.8% |
10.0% |
|
Europe |
2.8% |
6.9% |
|
Mexico |
0.3% |
0.5% |
|
Other Overseas |
0.6% |
0.8% |
*Source: 2003
Value of Tourism, Province of BC
Statistics Canada
surveyed tourists to Canada in 2001 on the activities they participated
in (more than one activity may be participated in while on a trip)
during their travels (Table 2.9) and also reported on the top ten major
overseas tourist markets in 2001 (Table 2.10).
|
Table 2-9
Visitor Activities While Visiting Canada
During 2001 |
|
Activity while visiting Canada |
Canadian Residents
% |
US
Residents
% |
Overseas Residents
% |
|
Visiting Friends or Relatives |
66 |
31 |
55 |
|
Participating in sports / outdoor
activities |
37 |
31 |
29 |
|
Shopping |
36 |
63 |
85 |
|
Sightseeing |
27 |
54 |
78 |
|
Going to a bar or nightclub |
15 |
22 |
30 |
|
Visiting a national park or provincial
nature park |
12 |
23 |
51 |
|
Visiting an historic site |
8 |
29 |
43 |
|
Boating (motor, sail, kayak, canoe, other) |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
Attending a sport event |
7 |
6 |
10 |
|
Visiting a museum or art gallery |
6 |
21 |
40 |
|
Table 2-10
Tourist Market for Visitors to Canada
During 2001 |
|
Tourist Market for visitors to Canada |
Trips
('000) |
Nights
('000) |
Spending per night
$ |
|
United Kingdom |
826 |
10092 |
101.66 |
|
Japan |
410 |
5314 |
119.12 |
|
France |
357 |
5254 |
82.98 |
|
Germany |
330 |
5281 |
85.97 |
|
Australia |
158 |
2464 |
99.00 |
|
Mexico |
148 |
1693 |
110.45 |
|
South Korea |
139 |
4063 |
64.97 |
|
Hong Kong |
125 |
2075 |
84.33 |
|
Taiwan |
118 |
1774 |
103.16 |
|
Netherlands |
114 |
1737 |
75.99 |
Another source of
valuable information is derived from the Travel Activities and
Motivation Survey commissioned by the Canadian Tourism Commission’s
Market Research department during 2000. Highlights of activity-based
market segments follow:
-
Visual Arts – demand for culturally based tourism products and
experiences has grown worldwide and Canada is no exception.
Potential market size: 1.7 million Canadians and 7.0 million
Americans with an expected faster than average growth rate over the
next 25 years due to an ageing population in both countries and
increasing immigration to Canada.
-
Soft Outdoor Adventure – is the largest market segment with 5.3
million Canadians and 35.5 million Americans. These enthusiasts tend
to be younger (18 – 44 years of age). The three most popular
activities are wildlife viewing, hiking/backpacking in wilderness
settings and fishing. The expected rate of growth over the next 25
years is positive, however changes may be required to accommodate
the needs and interests of an ageing population.
-
Hard Outdoor Adventure – there are approximately 1.6 million
Canadians and 15.7 million Americans in this segment. These
enthusiasts are characterized by their relative youth, affluence and
gender (largely male). Retention of this market segment will become
more difficult as the population becomes more highly urbanized and
older.
-
Performing Arts – a growing market with 1.3 million Canadians and
15.7 million Americans that is expected to grow at the fastest rate
over the next 25 years, fuelled by the aging population and
increasing immigration.
-
Heritage Tourism – represented by 2.6 million Canadians. This market
segment is expected to have the greatest growth spurt over the next
25 years. There is a strong link between heritage tourism and
outdoor enthusiasts, creating cross-marketing and packaging
opportunities.
|
Table 2-11
Rankings of Specific Activity-Based Segments
Travel Activities and Motivation Survey (2000)
|
|
All
Adults |
Adults with recent travel experience in Canada |
|
Canada |
US |
Canada |
US |
|
1. Soft Outdoor Adventure |
1. Soft Outdoor Adventure |
1. Soft Outdoor Adventure |
1. Heritage |
|
2. Winter Outdoors |
2. Heritage |
2. Winter Outdoors |
2. Soft Outdoor Adventure |
|
3. Alpine Skiing |
3. Visual Arts |
3. Alpine Skiing |
3. Visual Arts |
|
4. Heritage |
4. Wine/Culinery |
4. Heritage |
4. Wine/Culinery |
|
5. Visual Arts |
5. Alpine Skiing |
5. Visual Arts |
5. Alpine Skiing |
|
6. Wine/Culinery |
6. Hard Outdoor Adventure
|
6. Wine/Culinery |
6. Performing Arts |
|
7. Hard Outdoor Adventure
|
7. Performing Arts |
7. Hard Outdoor
Adventure |
7. Winter Outdoors |
|
8. Performing Arts
|
8. Winter Outdoors
|
8. Performing Arts |
8. Hard Outdoor
Adventure |
Summary Observations from Visitors to the
Region, Province and Country
It
appears that on a regional and provincial basis the largest tourism
market is regional Canada followed closely by US visitors and the
remainder of Canada. Soft Outdoor Adventure tourism is what most
travellers are seeking. Revelstoke with its scenic views, heritage
setting, and proximity to provincial and national parks, is strongly
positioned to accommodate the type of experiences potential visitors
desire.
Continue to Strength
and Weakness Analysis... |