|
Columbia Basin Trust
Community Initiatives Funding
|
|
The Columbia Basin Trust
established a 'geographic' spending program in late 1998 to involve
local governments in spending initiatives. A total of $188,008 is
allocated annually to the community of Revelstoke and 'affected area',
which includes Area B of the Columbia Shuswap Regional District (CSRD).
This allocation will continue for at least 10 years and does not have to
be disbursed every fiscal year - it can be held over to future years if
appropriate.
The total funds
available will be allocated equally to three key goal areas:
environmental, social and economic.
|
|
|
|
Project Submission And Approval Process
|
|
|
|
Step 1. Call for proposals
|
|
A proposal information package, which includes the proposal process, details on proposal evaluation criteria and an application form, has been prepared by the City to assist proposal writers.
Contact Debra Wozniak, Project Coordinator, for the proposal information package or more program information at (250) 837-5345 or
dwozniak@revelstoke.net
|
|
Step 2. Proposal Writing Workshop
|
A workshop for proposal writers is held on demand to encourage the development of sound proposals.
|
|
Step 3. Screening
|
The objective of this step is to avoid detailed evaluation and community input on projects that are not appropriate or not fully developed for consideration under this program. A City staff member and 2-3 members of the Project Evaluation Team will screen proposals based on defined screening criteria (See Project Evaluation Criteria ). The reasons for the decision to screen out a proposal will be explained to project applicants by telephone, and applicants will have a week to reconcile the issues, if that is possible.
|
|
Step 4. Community meeting
|
|
A community meeting will be held to encourage sharing of information and ideas between community members and to measure community support for proposals. Meetings will follow these practices:
- Meeting attendees will sign in and record their affiliation or the project they are interested in.
- Project applicants are to arrange for the most knowledgeable person to make a brief (3-5 minute) presentation and answer questions about their proposal. Applicants will also be invited to set up a simple display and be available in the meeting room to answer questions before and after the presentations.
- Those who attend the meeting will indicate their level of support for individual projects. Elected officials will have the right to supplement (temper) the ranking for support from the meeting.
It must be absolutely clear that projects must rank well in terms of the key community goals and the general project criteria to be approved for funding - a high level of support at the community meeting does not mean a project is assured funding approval.
|
|
Step 5. Proposal evaluation
|
|
The objective of this step is to recommend projects for approval to City Council and the CSRD Area B Director. Evaluation of each project's fulfillment of key community goals, general project criteria and community support (See Project Evaluation Criteria attached) will be completed by the Project Evaluation Team. The evaluation team consists of five community residents with knowledge and expertise in at least one of the economic, environmental or social goal areas and is appointed by the City of Revelstoke.
Project evaluations and funding recommendations will be presented to City Council and the CSRD Area B Director. Evaluations will be available to project applicants and the public on request.
|
|
Step 6. Decisions by City Council and CSRD Area B Director
|
City Council and the CSRD Area B Director will review the project evaluations and funding recommendations and make final funding approvals.
|
|
Step 7. Public communication
|
Project applicants will be informed of funding decisions, and reasons for the decisions, as soon as possible. The general public will be notified of funding decisions via local media. Public response to the process will be considered and addressed in the next proposal intake and review.
|
|
Step 8. Administration of agreements
|
The City of Revelstoke will enter into an agreement with the legal entity representing the approved project. Once the agreements have been signed, project funds will be advanced. Projects will be monitored by City staff to ensure that the objectives set out in the project proposal are being met.
|
|
Proposal Intake And Review Timeline
|
Proposals are accepted generally once per year in the early Spring with funding approvals processed in April.
|
|
Project Evaluation Criteria
|
|
The project evaluation criteria include four components:
The screening criteria will be applied early in the proposal review process to avoid unnecessary consideration of projects that do not meet key aspects of this program. The remaining three categories -
key community goals, general project criteria and
community support - will be assigned a point value for evaluation and ranking of proposals. A maximum of 100 points will be distributed as follows: 50 points to key community goals, 35 points to general project criteria and 15 points to community support.
|
|
The project submission
checklist is to be completed by the applicant (Section D of the
application) and reviewed by the program coordinator to ensure that the
project is appropriate for funding consideration. The application is
also reviewed to ensure that all questions have been answered
adequately, and if required the project proponent may be contacted for
further clarification.
For projects seeking
operational funding, On-going Operational Costs are defined as:
- Those costs which
are intended to support staff positions and regular payments
expected to be made by the organization in order to ensure the
continuity of its operations. These would include among others; rent
payments; utilities; levies; and other contractual obligations.
Further there is an expectation that such funding would be required
to support these activities until the organization ceases its
operations or at least for a long period of time.
- Staff and other
costs deemed to be operational costs may be eligible for funding if:
- They are
designated for a project to be undertaken by the organization
for a period of time of no more than 3 years.
- They are
designated as start up costs for the organization but there is a
clear plan for on-going support of the operations in the future
and that the time frame for the longer term operational funding
is outlined in the plan.
- They are
identified in the proposal as operational costs for longer than
three years, but there is very clear evidence of community
support and there is a clear exit strategy outlined in the plan.
|
|
A maximum of 50% of the total points will be assigned to assess the fulfillment of these goals by a project proposal. Distribution of the points:
|
Environmental Goals
The following goals
apply in the context of contributing to environmental quality and health
in a way that makes a difference:
1. Improvements to
ecological and environmental conditions (maximum 10 points)
Includes factors such as:
- habitat
conservation, reclamation and/or rehabilitation
- protection /
recovery of endangered species
- maintain
healthy wildlife populations
- reduce
human-wildlife conflicts
2. Increase
ecological and environmental knowledge / stewardship amongst citizens,
businesses, government (maximum 10 points)
Includes factors such as:
- environmental
coordination programs
- educational
programs and knowledge dissemination
- recognition
and incentive programs for environmental awareness / stewardship
- special events
and celebrations
3. Reduction /
Improvement of environmental impacts of human activities (maximum 10
points)
Includes factors such as:
- toxic waste
reduction
- air & water
quality improvements
- noise & light
pollution reduction
- solid waste
management
- increase
recycling activities
- energy
efficiency and reduction of green house gases
4. Increase
scientific knowledge (maximum 10 points)
Includes factors such as:
- improve
archiving, accessibility and use of ecological / environmental
information and expertise
- biological
research and inventories
- environmental
monitoring
5. Land Use
Planning Processes (maximum 10 points)
Includes factors such as:
- sustainable
resource management
- urban forest,
parks and green space
- reservoir
operations
- forest
management
- wetlands
management
|
Social Goals
The social goals are intended to include all age groups, ethnic/cultural diversity, gender and economic groups in the community.
- Social Support Network and Leadership (max 15 points)
- Strengthen existing programs and services to meet current needs
- Create new programs and services to meet emerging needs
- Develop leadership and organizational capacity
- Support community participation, sense of belonging and volunteerism
- Wellness and Health / Safety and Security (max 10 points)
- Access to and provision of adequate services (physical, mental & social well being)
- Promotion / education of healthy lifestyles
- Provision of affordable housing
- Address conditions leading to substance abuse
- Address conditions leading to violence and crime
- Address poverty
- Education (max 10 points)
- Create first-class, integrated, lifelong community learning opportunities
- Provision of adult education to meet individual skill development requirements
- Build community support for the school (K-12) system
- Address literacy and learning disabilities
- Recreation, Arts, Culture and Spiritual Values (max 15 points)
- Develop diverse recreational opportunities
- Increase participation in arts and cultural activities
- Expand recreation, arts, culture and heritage infrastructure
|
Economic Goals
- Support long-term economic stability and growth in the area (maximum 10 points)
Includes factors such as:
- increases net economic activities including spin-offs and ripple effects
- provision of infrastructure or support to achieve economic goals
- creates a positive economic environment
- is sustainable and stable over the long term
- brings income into the local economy (contributes to economic base activities)
- adds value to an existing product or service
- consistent with the Community Economic Development Strategy
- Increase economic diversity in the area (maximum 10 points)
Includes factors such as:
- diversifies existing economic sector dependencies
- provides a new product or service to the local economy
- increases local participation in information and technology sectors
- fosters entrepreneurship and small business development
- supports business training and skill development
- Increase local employment opportunities (maximum 10 points)
Includes factors such as:
- number of jobs created (direct and indirect)
- access to employment for local citizens especially unemployed, underemployed and youth
- proposed employee training component
- wage rates (living wage most desirable)
- stability of employment (full-time employment preferred)
- Encourage financial investment in the area (maximum 10 points)
Includes investments in people and organizations or capital investments in land, buildings, infrastructure, etc.
- Promote local control and benefits (maximum 10 points)
Includes factors such as:
- residency of proponent
- opportunities for participation
- distribution of benefits
|
These criteria assess a number of practical factors. A maximum of 35% of the total points will be allocated to these criteria.
- Project planning (maximum 10 points)
- project proponent has the demonstrated organizational capacity and appropriate expertise
- adequate and logical background and planning leading to a technically sound proposal
- project encourages innovation and shows a creative approach
- a sustainability plan has been prepared for multi-year or long term projects
- Funding (maximum 10 points)
- leverages funds from other sources
- best funding option (i.e. there is not an alternative funding source)
- cost effective
- preference will be given to local purchase and employment
- Urgency (maximum 8 points)
- seriousness of the issue addressed
- ongoing work requiring continuity
- time sensitive
- Builds community capacity (maximum 7 points)
- builds capacity (knowledge, expertise, organizational ability, etc.) within community organizations
- provides opportunities to develop local skills and knowledge
- builds collaborative community and broader partnerships
|
Community support will be measured through a community meeting as described in the Proposal Review and Approval Process link - Step 4. A maximum of 15% of the total points will be allocated to community support.
|
2007 Projects Funded
|
|
2007 PROJECT FUNDED |
APPLICANT
|
AMOUNT |
|
Food Bank |
Community Connections |
10,000 |
|
Revelstoke Awareness & Outreach |
Canadian Mental Health Association |
6,020 |
|
Family Literacy Programs |
Columbia Basin Alliance for Literacy |
8,250 |
|
RSS Subsidies to attend CMI Conferences |
Columbia Mountains Institute |
1,000 |
|
Bear Aware Program |
Revelstoke Bear Aware Society |
11,760 |
|
Hospice Volunteer Training |
Revelstoke Hospice Society |
6,330 |
|
Transitions Together Mentorship |
Revelstoke Womens Shelter Society |
5,000 |
|
Youth Program |
Community Connections |
15,000 |
|
Kootenay Zone Theatre Festival |
Revelstoke Theatre Company |
3,000 |
|
Early Learning & Care Resource Centre |
Revelstoke Community Child Care Society |
20,000 |
|
Accelerated Reader Program |
Columbia Park Elementary School |
2,745 |
|
Collective Marketing Program |
Revelstoke Railway Museum |
6,000 |
|
Seniors Helping Seniors |
Revelstoke Senior Citizens Association |
10,246 |
|
Museum Exhibit Projects |
Revelstoke Museum & Archives |
6,300 |
|
Lacrosse Formation |
Revelstoke Minor Lacrosse Association |
3,358 |
|
Community Advocate |
Community Connections |
10,000 |
|
Operating Funds for Staffing |
Revelstoke Visual Arts Centre |
15,000 |
|
Ski Equipment Upgrades |
Revelstoke Ski Club |
7,000 |
|
Skating Club Operations |
Revelstoke Figure Skating Club |
5,200 |
|
Mountain Beats Festival |
Revelstoke Mountain Culture Society |
4,000 |
|
Community Training Support |
Okanagan College |
10,000 |
|
Centre of Learning |
Okanagan College |
5,000 |
|
Revelstoke Carshare Program |
Rev. Branch of Nelson Carshare Cooperative |
2,000 |
|
2007 Project Totals |
$173,209 |
|
|
1998 Project Totals |
143,668 |
|
1999 Project Totals |
132,526 |
|
2000 Project Totals |
216,569 |
|
2001 Project Totals |
177,787 |
|
2002 Project Totals |
173,300 |
|
2003 Project Totals |
170,000 |
|
2004 Project Totals |
161,663 |
|
2005 Project Totals |
147,900 |
|
2006 Project Totals |
189,960 |
|
|
Total Funding 1998
- 2007 |
1,686,582 |
|